| 10k | <5000 | >5000 |
Vpip | 25.29 | 26.53 | 24.66 |
pfr | 15.86 | 16.83 | 14.9 |
W$wsf | 44.79 | 44.1 | 45.48 |
Wtsd | 26.79 | 26.37 | 27.2 |
W$sd | 42.63 | 44.1 | 43 |
Af | 2.65 | 2.65 | 2.65 |
Afq | 53.67 | 42.25 | 53.79 |
3bet | 6.38 | 5.62 | 7.19 |
fold3bet | 57.41 | 58.59 | 56.07 |
att to steal | 28.35 | 27.13 | 29.34 |
fold bb to steal | 75 | 85 | 66.67 |
fold sb to steal | 88 | 89.47 | 87.1 |
so...open-limp is profitable. oh, and i only limp in with speculative hands and i always make 3-5BB bet with premium hands.
my open range is pretty loose, however with limping in i may play even more hands.
here's how 26% range looks like:
here's how i play these hands.
hands 1-5k (-$11.12):
hands 5k-10k(+$26.53):
huge difference. i still have to find why. starting hands are the same, strategy is pretty much the same (according to stats). maybe it's pareto principle :) my 1st guess it's due to aggression(red line, drastic changes in AFq). my 2nd guess is even though my vpip% is the same, the actual cards i played are quite different. here's how i played cards that are outside this pokerstove range when i wasn't on the button or BB/SB.
hands 1-5k(-$8.82):
hands 5k-10k(+$2.08)
total number of hands outside 26% range that i played without position is pretty much the same however i played them more aggressively..or folded them earlier.
From your pokerstove pic you make it look like you play the same range from any position - you're not though, aren't you?
ReplyDeleteSo after that analysis did you decide to change anything?